Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boddah

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete -- Francs2000 | Talk 12:07, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Boddah

Comment For the record, there has been some stacking going on in this VdF. It used to be that what was above my below post was a previous VdF against Boddah (or was here when I made the VdF page, anyway). These previous votes now begin with LeeHunter's and end with Geogre's, as best I can tell. Now multiple votes have been moved, making figuring out who did them more difficult, but I've listed their authors as best as I could.--DNicholls 08:32, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by jab (209.221.45.145) There is no stacking, but whoever added their vote just put it on top instead of putting them on bottom.

Keep. Boddah is a prominent channel of a very large IRC server. I'm surprised that articles such as the List of ethnic slurs containing such popular phrases as Bourneville Boulevardier (a homosexual man from Birmingham) and Kosher Klansman (a Hassidic or Orthodox Jew) are more notable and less offensive than this article. (posted w/out signing by Mr. Ables--DNicholls 08:25, 24 July 2005 (UTC))[reply]
I find it hilarious that little Johnny can go to the list of ethnic slurs and ask me "Daddy, what is a potato rapist?", but THIS is up for deletion instead. Keep. (posted w/out signing by 68.108.111.141 --DNicholls 08:25, 24 July 2005 (UTC))[reply]
KEEP There's much more offensive material on here (for example, the above) than on this page. It's just detailing the culture and history of the chat. CaptaintravelB
KEEP This is a very prominent chatroom on IRC, and socially important. It remarks the social togetherness of the different races in a different method, a method that may not be widely accepted, but is very effective.(posted w/out signing by 172.158.211.21--DNicholls 08:25, 24 July 2005 (UTC))[reply]
Keep. It's not recreated, since it should have never been deleted. I don't see the problem. It's not like "Boddah" is a desirable wikiarticle name. We're still not done, either. (posted w/out signing by 209.221.45.145--DNicholls 08:25, 24 July 2005 (UTC))[reply]

"young, demure, and sexually charged" but unfortunately not notable. --LeeHunter 00:09, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Yeah. Kibo is "one of the internet's most famous figures." Not this guy. Delete for vanity. Inky 01:14, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Speedy deleted as recreation of previously deleted material. Previously as Bodah, I believe. Were it not so, it was speedy deleteable as pure hoax/prank/test page. Geogre 02:37, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Putting this up for deletion again. Perhaps a speedy delete? They've been at work for 3 days, and it's nifty, but not notable enough for wp. Delete--DNicholls 08:33, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Offensive and probably constructed as such. Hamster Sandwich 08:53, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as inconsequential chat room. Speedy if Geogre is correct and this is a recreation of a previously deleted article. Capitalistroadster 18:11, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, random noise. Wile E. Heresiarch 19:31, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this should have been speedied as a recreated article. Sockpuppet noise doesnt help. JamesBurns 03:37, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.