Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-sexual custodial rape
The fourth incarnation of Custodial Rape (non-sexual), by the same author. -- Antaeus Feldspar 21:10, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Not again. Delete. Same reason as the others. — Gwalla | Talk 00:44, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. A polite message has been left for the perpetrator, not by me, I tried to write one but failed. I'm guessing this is the same person as this IP. Andrewa 00:59, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Actually, I think it's the fifth incarnation, because I think another one got speedied along the way, but I could be wrong. It's regrettable that the author, who actually has some useful information he could contribute, is going out of his way to create so much trouble for himself. JamesMLane 03:13, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Well, I only counted four by looking at the user contributions of 68.66.238.191 and mrindianajonesprm, but I could have miscounted. BTW, if these are deleted, the redirects to them will be deleted too, right? (I found them, I was going to list them on WP:RfD, but then I realized, wait, they'll probably be handled with the article... but then I couldn't find anything on either RfD or VfD to clarify that that was in fact the case.) -- Antaeus Feldspar 03:41, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Comment: I'm hoping that we can be pragmatic enough that, once the first of these goes through VfD and is deleted on consensus, the duplicates all become speedies. That may be more in the spirit of the rules than the letter of them, but our goal here is to build an encyclopedia. And even by the letter of the law, any further occurrences will be speedied. No change of vote. Andrewa 05:59, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Well, I only counted four by looking at the user contributions of 68.66.238.191 and mrindianajonesprm, but I could have miscounted. BTW, if these are deleted, the redirects to them will be deleted too, right? (I found them, I was going to list them on WP:RfD, but then I realized, wait, they'll probably be handled with the article... but then I couldn't find anything on either RfD or VfD to clarify that that was in fact the case.) -- Antaeus Feldspar 03:41, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete for reasons I gave above in Custodial Rape (non-sexual), add to that the egregiousness of further redundancy. Fire Star 04:07, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. See previous incarnations. This is getting ridiculous. Average Earthman 08:53, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as spam, surely - David Gerard 11:46, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete and ban. Wikipedia Is Not A Megaphone. - KeithTyler 19:31, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete.
- Delete Jayjg 02:46, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)