User talk:Stthomse
Here are some links I thought useful:
- Wikipedia:Tutorial
- Wikipedia:Help desk
- M:Foundation issues
- Wikipedia:Policy Library
- Wikipedia:Utilities
- Wikipedia:Cite your sources
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:Wikiquette
- Wikipedia:Civility
- Wikipedia:Conflict resolution
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Wikipedia:Pages needing attention
- Wikipedia:Peer review
- Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
- Wikipedia:Brilliant prose
- Wikipedia:List of images
- Wikipedia:Boilerplate text
- Wikipedia:Current polls
- Wikipedia:Mailing lists
- Wikipedia:IRC channel
Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. The Wikipedia:Village pump is also a good place to go for quick answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.
[[User:Sam Spade|Vote Sam Spade for Arbiter!]] 17:00, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
British hardened field defences of World War II
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution to the article British hardened field defences of World War II.
I hope you will help me understand your contribution. I have not previously heard of a Type 20/2 pillbox and it seems from the description that you might have in mind something I have previously heard called an Eared pillbox. I did not understand the reference you provided - another editor has now deleted those references. Gaius Cornelius (talk) 19:56, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
The reference refers to the Norfolk Historical Environment Record. I've updated the reference to include a link to their site and added some text to indicate the similarity of the type 20/2 to the eared pillbox. The main difference being the angle of the emplacements to each other. The eared pillbox having a shallow angle with the type 20/2 being closer to 90 degrees. FYI I'm the author of the Google Earth Defence of Britain overlay and have seen pretty much every variant pillbox type in existence whilst checking the accuracy of the placemarks in Google Earth. I'm currently in the process of adding sites that are not in the original database but do occur in the National Monument Record and the various online Historical Environment Records. This is how I've learnt about these variants. I've added a link to the Essex Lozenge reference too, there are tens of this type still in existence so I wasn't sure why the comment questioned if it was a recognised type so I deleted it. I'll admit to coining the name but they don't have an official type that I've seen listed so it needs a name to distinguish it from the normal Lozenge pillbox which is Hexagonal rather than Octagonal.Stthomse (talk) 18:31, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Stthomse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm being blocked for being on an open proxy but this is not the case. I am behind a company firewall/proxy which maybe is being misidentified as an open proxy, IP is 212.118.224.151Stthomse (talk) 12:35, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Another admin has now unblocked 212.118.224.151, so you should be able to edit. If you are still unable, please open a new request with what ever information you have. Monty845 02:22, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- You need to provide the blocked IP address so an admin can look into it. --Closedmouth (talk) 12:41, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Blocked IP is 212.118.224.151 Stthomse (talk) 13:01, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
- You appear to be editing from a password protected web proxy. I'll poke the admin who blocked the IP about it. Monty845 16:29, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Essex lozenge.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Essex lozenge.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 18:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)