User talk:Knightt

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

[[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 16:45, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC)

The THEOSOPHICAL UNIVERSITY PRESS has granted reprint in Wakipedia under the terms that the source is identified. Please see the talk page for further information. [1].Knightt 21:17, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Hello Knightt, thanks for that information and your effort. I think this information and the Glossary itself should be better known (as it seems to be a very useful resource), that's why I wrote an article about the Theosophical Glossary. See Theosophical Glossary and its talk page. (Still, I wonder if he only gave you the permission to do so or to other wikipedians as well. Maybe I'm just paranoid about copyrights.) Best wishes. --Loa 23:24, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Cayce

Welcome to wiki, please see my reply.--Jondel 08:58, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Steiner

Thanks for your contributions. Arbitration proceedings determined that quotes from Steiner should not be used in this and related articles; peer-reviewed and independently (non-anthroposophically) published sources should rather be drawn upon. I took the liberty of modifying the page accordingly. Hgilbert (talk) 16:41, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See here for the very clear guideline we were given by the arbitrators]; we can look at what quotes are actually still allowable. We've been using a strict interpretation to avoid running afoul of the arbitrators again. Hgilbert (talk) 16:58, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Eidolon (astral double)

I have nominated Eidolon (astral double), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eidolon (astral double). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ash (talk) 13:05, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eidolon (apparition) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eidolon (apparition) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eidolon (apparition) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LuckyLouie (talk) 02:02, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]