Talk:Racial Holy War

The old external link, www.creator.org.au, no longer works (the domain is inactive).

David Gerard 16:33, 4 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Reinstated most of an earlier version of the article, with grammar cleanup and refactoring. "racist terminology" doesn't strike me as a coherent thing - someone will probably have a better idea.

David Gerard 16:54, 4 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Racially Holy War is a diverse movement.

Although the article states that the term isn't given much use outside of white supremacist groups, it claims from the outset that the concept is exclusive to white groups. This is somewhat confuzzling!

Merge

I propose that this page be merged with Creativity Movement --scochran4 (talk) 10:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Will Beback talk 19:56, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimately, I believe that Creativity (the religion) should be differentiated from the Creativity Movement (the organization). If that becomes the case, Racial Holy War would fall under Creativity, the religion. For now, since Creativity Movement is the main Creativity article I think Racial Holy War should be merged with that article.

That said, the term Racial Holy War, and it's shortened form RaHoWa both originated with the religion and is used to a large extent by many of its members. It is overlooked in the main Creativity articles entirely and instead of having an entirely separate article just about the term, it would be best to merge the two so that the articles are more organized and so related topics are less scattered. --scochran4 (talk) 20:23, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If major changes are pending to the target article then it'd be better to make those first. Just because this article is about a concept developed by "Creativity (the religion)" doesn't mean that it needs to be merged there. We have many articles on religious concepts, like Jihad. Will Beback talk 20:54, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge. Articles can be separated again later if they grow long enough to merit that, but there doesn't seem to me to be sufficient cause to keep them separate. John Carter (talk) 01:42, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge. This is a brief article on a subject intimately tied with that of the religion. I think the merger makes sense. LadyofShalott ^Weave 19:50, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sold on the merits, but I don't oppose the merge. Will Beback talk 20:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose merge. Even though the term originated with the religion, it is now used extensively among Neo-Nazi's, White Supremacists, etc. It is no longer directly connected. I advocate leaving this article seperate with a notable mention at Creativity Movement and Creativity Alliance --scochran4 (talk) 04:52, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Atheist & Christian Project Banners

I took the liberty of removing the atheist & Christian project banners as there was nothing here or in the article itself regarding either of those topics. Do note that I am not saying that those topics are unrelated to the topic of the article, only that there's nothing related to be found in the current content of the article. -Brother Dave Thompson (talk) 08:18, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]