Talk:Titi monkey
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2020 and 1 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Colesamber5.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Members of Callicebinae
[edit]"They are the only members of the Callicebinae subfamily"
Are they? Don't Xenothrix, Paralouatta, Antillothrix (nl:West-Indische apen) and a couple of fossil genera belong to the Callicebinae too? Ucucha (talk) 14:01, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
- I don't see those listed in Groves or MSW. Perhaps we mean to say "...only extant members..." - UtherSRG (talk) 14:30, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
- Maybe. Xenothrix has gone extinct only by 1700, though. Still, it is extinct ;-). Ucucha (talk) 15:21, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
One of these has an article now: Homunculus. Ucucha (talk) 16:11, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
New species
[edit]New species discovered in Columbia by Conservation International. Scientific Name is C. Caquetensis. Only 250 are known to exist. (Source: MSN Science news) --Dutch206 (talk) 18:21, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, they is already an article for the species you're talking about (Caquetá Titi) and it is mentioned on this page. Cheers, Jack (talk) 23:21, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Callicebus urubambensis, new species
[edit]http://phys.org/news/2015-08-titi-monkey-species-peru.html mentions that the Urubamba brown titi monkey has been identified as a new species. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lars~enwiki (talk • contribs) 03:52, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
please create a colored probabilistic density map (more color, more population)
[edit]Ornate Titi?
[edit]On this page, the Ornate Titi is listed as being Plecturocebus ornatus and is in the P. moloch group, however on its own article, it has the name of Callicebus ornatus. Is there some confusion between scientific names, or is it somehow part of both groups? Scotth1001 (talk) 20:43, 4 March 2017 (UTC)