Talk:The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2

The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 27, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
October 2, 2009	Good article reassessment	Delisted

A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on March 1, 2004.

Current status: Delisted good article

Middle-earth High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle-earth, which aims to build an encyclopedic guide to J. R. R. Tolkien, his legendarium, and related topics. Please visit the project talk page for suggestions and ideas on how you can improve this and other articles.Middle-earthWikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earthTemplate:WikiProject Middle-earthTolkien articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note: Though it states in the Guide to writing better articles that generally fictional articles should be written in present tense, all Tolkien legendarium-related articles that cover in-universe material before the current action must be written in past tense. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earth/Standards for more information about this and other article standards.

Film: British / German / New Zealand / American C‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the German cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

New Zealand High‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Mlpearc, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 19 July 2011.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Minor places in Middle-earth#O|Osgiliath]]
[[Shire (Middle-earth)#Westfarthing|Hobbiton]] The anchor (#Westfarthing) has been deleted by other users before.
[[Special effects of The Lord of the Rings film series#Size Doubles|size double]] The anchor (#Size Doubles) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

The Superman Films

The article incorrectly implies the LOTR film trilogy was the first attempt at simultaneous film shoot productions for a film series. This isn't the case. The first attempt by a film studio to shoot a movie and it's sequel at the exact same time was the 1978 Superman film and Superman 2. The shooting of the second film as originally planned was halted deep in filming due to the studio being concerned about the potential Box Office of the first film, and Richard Donner was later fired. Superman 2 was 80%-90% completed at the time production was halted to "focus on getting the first film right". Ultimately Donner's own version of the movie, as mostly simultaneously filmed, was released in 2006 as "Superman 2: The Richard Donner Cut" and was better received than the 1980 Richard Lester release was. This should be in a brief notation next to the statement about this being the "First Simultaneous Film Production in a movie series". It's technically actually the Superman 1 & 2: Donner Cut, although the latter 2006 film was released after LOTR. Colliric (talk) 12:41, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is clean sweep?

the intro paragaraph says "therefore tying for the record for the most Academy Awards won by a single film and holding the record for the highest clean sweep at the Oscars. " what is a clean sweep in this instance? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.138.224.125 (talk) 19:08, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Saruman et al

Why important scenes like Saruman being killed, Eomer riding to battle in secret, Witch-king death prophecy, Faramir and Eomer falling in love aren't in the plot? Some scenes are from extended version, while some are in theatrical also. Gevorg89 (talk) 20:55, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The section about Comparison with the Source Material explains the omission of plot points like these and others, and the substitution of jarring and sometimes nonsensical things, very well. These are poor decisions by the producer and screenwriters. In the time allotted, the story could have been told properly. Although I don't think Faramir and Eomer ever fell in love :-) Wastrel Way (talk) 01:36, 25 July 2022 (UTC) Eric[reply]

Epilogues

I just added the epilogue to Samwise Gamgee and the fact that the films don't have the character epilogues, and I want to add the epilogues of all the Fellowship members but while I have a source (it's not an article on a trusted site, but rather a YouTube video by Tolkien YouTube channel Men of the West. I hope that's okay), I don't know how to properly word the rest of them in a style appropriate for Wikipedia. Triviatronic9000 (talk) 18:32, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Smeagol is not a hobbit

159.87.87.61 (talk) 18:52, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes he was. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:12, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, you're right, I misinterpreted a line in the book. 159.87.87.61 (talk) 21:51, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]