Talk:Operation Corporate

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

South America: Falklands

	Latin America portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
	This redirect is supported by the Falkland Islands work group.

Is this page necessary except as a redirect to the F war page? 207.189.98.44 20:41, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Maybe not, I like military codewords and so tend to post pages on those lines. Perhaps this page is more a of a military history of that war. I see no harm in keeping it. Paul, in Saudi

It is necessary. Operation Corporate is not the same as the entire war, in the same way that Operation Rosario is not representative of the entire war. David Newton 13:31, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Bit too one-sided piece. It's certainly not over-the-top, but I think it crosses the line a tad. Needs to be more objective -- less pro-Brit.

Pazouzou 09:32, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)

How the hell is it 'pro-Brit'? Douglasnicol 23:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

Get rid of this unnecessary stub. Mztourist (talk) 09:12, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]