User talk:ClaudeMuncey

old discussions

I responded to your note on my talk page. Cheers! --maveric149, Saturday, April 27, 2002

Hi, I have introduced a proposal for a WikiProject Protected Areas. That was before I read the talk:National park page. You have some good ideas there which can also be used in the project. It's rather theoretical for the moment, but I have written a few testcases (see links on the project page). When you have the time could you have a look at it, and let me know what you think of it? Thanks! -- Guy

I know you'll probably never come back to read this, but good job on Half Dome! -Smack 18:00 1 Jul 2003 (UTC)

Try and drop in more than once a year. The WikiProject Protected Areas could do with rejuvenating Tiles 08:25, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)

You posted this on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions at some point:

A truly minor issue about ship naming -- Is there a technical reason for a hyphen between the hull type and hull number for US naval ships -- that is not standard US naval usage as shown in the US naval register http://www.nvr.navy.mil ClaudeMuncey

This is just a very common error (much like people writing "the HMS Royal Oak" or somesuch). It would be a pretty huge project to fix them all, though... Tkinias 03:37, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Hope your back

The parks articles need more workers. I thought I would mention my article Protected areas of Michigan which is quite a bit different in approach from your Protected areas of California. Rmhermen 14:55, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)

Saints Wikiproject

I noted that you have been contributing to articles about saints. I invite you to join the WikiProject Saints.

You are invited to participate in Saints WikiProject, a project dedicated to developing and improving articles about saints. We are currently discussing prospects for the project. Your input would be greatly appreciated!

I also invite you to join the discussion on prayers and infoboxes here: Prayers_are_NPOV.

Thanks! --evrik 17:45, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder

This is a reminder to go vote by June 7 for the
Catholic Collaboration of the Week.
Support or comment on the current nominations, or nominate an article for collaboration.

Wikiproject Catholicism Assessment

Hello, fellow WikiProject Catholicism member. The project has recently begun work on assessing articles relating to Catholicism, and you are invited to comment and participate. The subpage for this assessment is located here. Thank you. —Mi ra 07:32, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move Roman Catholic Church to Catholic Church

There is a vote at Talk:Roman Catholic Church: A Vote on the Title of this Article on moving Roman Catholic Church to Catholic Church. You are invited to review it. --WikiCats 04:01, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic Collaboration

This is a reminder to go vote for the
Catholic Collaboration Effort.
Support or comment on the current nominations, or nominate an article for collaboration.
Current nominations:

Ariedartin JECJY ^Talk 12:52, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Diocesan Infobox

To the creators of Diocesan/Archdiocesan articles

I have proposed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Catholicism an infobox for Catholic Dioceses. I have not gotten any feedback on this proposal, so I’m culling feedback, advice, corrections, etc. for this. If you have the time, would you check out User:SkierRMH/Diocese_Infobox and give me some feedback! Thanks much!!

Editors needed to stifle purging of pro-life material

Hi, we desperately need some experienced editors willing to jump into the discussion page at post-abortion syndrome -- and bring some friends.

A group of editors have openly discussed "viligent" "purging" of information from peer reviewed sources which support the "controversial" idea that women who have abortions may suffer subsequent emotional problems. Though I have lots of expertise in the area, the "abortion is benign crowd and anyone who disagrees is untrustworthy" are in a revert war with me. I need more voices in there to remind them that deleting peer reviewed material goes against Wikpedia policy. I'd appreciate you adding post-abortion syndrome to your watch page and some periodic comments of support.

One of their common tactics, remove all facts that go against their position insisting there isn't "consensus" that they are reliable and should be added...even if from peer reviewed sources! I need people to support my edits--in a field in which I am long on expertise and they are long on bias.--Strider12 (talk) 04:14, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

National parks of Northern Ireland

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article National parks of Northern Ireland, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of National parks of Northern Ireland. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:06, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish-language mass

Thanks for your note on the St. Finbar talk page. The source that I based the comments on (from the Los Angeles Times) indicated that St. Finbar's was one of the first Catholic churches in California to offer Spanish-language Mass, when it began doing so in the early 1990s, and that it was a highly controversial move. You mentioned that there were Spanish-language Masses offered decades earlier, and I was wondering if you could direct me to a source to help provide clearer information. I grew up in the post-Vatican II era and therefore assumed that all Masses in the era of Spanish rule and in the time of Archbishop Cantwell (1917-1947) were offered in the Latin language. By the way, I have been starting pages in the last couple weeks for some of the most important, notable parishes in the L.A. Archdiocese (e.g., St. Andrew's Catholic Church, Pasadena, St. Charles Borromeo Church (North Hollywood), St. Monica Catholic Church, Santa Monica, St. Robert Bellarmine Catholic Church, St. Augustine Catholic Church, Culver City, and would welcome any comments or information you might care to offer.Cbl62 (talk) 05:33, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Consider, as an example, St. Joseph the Worker in the San Fernando Valley, not to far down the road from St. Finbar's, which lists a first Spanish Mass in 1982. (http://www.sjwchurch.com/SJWHistory/firsts.htm) as far as the Spanish language parishes established in the 1920's and 1930's, I am sure that Latin was the liturgical language at the time. But what language do you think it's likely they shifted to under the post-Vatican II liturgical changes? ClaudeMuncey (talk) 14:24, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity

Hello ClaudeMuncey!

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Christianity

The goal of WikiProject Christianity is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Christianity available on Wikipedia. WP:X as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Christianity, but prefers that all Christian traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

You are receiving this invitation because you are a member of one of the related Christianity Projects and I thought that you might be interested in this project also - Tinucherian (talk) 06:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment of Catholic social teaching

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Catholic social teaching/GA1. I have placed the article on hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:47, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom

Your user page

Hello, I found your user page while doing some wikiarchaeology. . I have restored all of its earliest surviving revisions from old copies of the Wikipedia database, so they are available to everyone now. Hope you don't mind. Graham87 06:30, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feast day listed at Redirects for discussion

I have asked for a discussion to address the redirect Feast day. You might want to participate in the redirect discussion.

You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Catholicism and/or WikiProject Saints --Jayarathina (talk) 12:32, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Mexican War) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Mexican War, ClaudeMuncey!

Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Reviewed

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SamHolt6 (talk) 02:09, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear ClaudeMuncey,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 16:50, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]