Talk:Type Ia sensory fiber

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neuroscience High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anatomy: Neuroanatomy High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to neuroanatomy.

Too technical

This is too technical for me to wikify. --rbrwr ^± 14:31, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I have written another article from scratch, because the original contribution was not adequate. User:Rsabbatini.

misleading with the type II axons

type II axons reports muscle length, not change in muscle length? Or am i wrong? That is at least what is written in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_II_sensory_fiber.

Maybe a bad idea to use wikipedia suorces for making wikipedia articles, but i have a feeling that i am righ here. Maybe someone that is sure could tell? In the way it is now i find the table very confusing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.241.72.216 (talk) 15:42, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The II neurons fiber don't fire when the muscle is still, rather, they fire when the muscle is still but they actually fire even more when there is a velocity. 145.94.155.187 (talk) 19:31, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fibers vs neurons

This article would be much clearer if the word "fiber" was changed to become "neuron" when speaking about a sensory fiber. As a student, when I think of a neuromotor-related fiber, I think of a muscle fiber. Talking about the Ia fiber makes me think of slow-twitch muscle fibers... it makes this entire article very confusing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.171.164.211 (talk) 12:09, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Function of muscle spindles

This may be a poor question. But, if, as the article states, the muscle spindle is parallel with contractile fibers then why does the image seem to depict them in series? Vokesk (talk) 22:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]