Talk:Spacehog

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

New York City

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Rock music

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Antonylangdon (talk · contribs) / Spacehog This user has contributed to the article.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Spacehog be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled

spacehog yeah!

The article says "It went platinum on the Billboard charts, selling over 500,000 copies", though a platnium album is one which sells over 1,000,000 copies. Is this record actually gold, or did it actually sell over a million copies?

Noticed a few grammatical errors while rereading the article, most blaring was the sentence at the end, "In 2002, Spacehog quietly broke up and the band members went their separate ways, though in 2004, Royston Langdon teamed up with the remaining members of Blind Melon to form the band The Quick - later, running into problems touring with the name, they decided on The Tender Trio, sadly The The Tender Trio broke up on March 2nd, 2006." Not only on the verge of being nonsensical, I think my high school English teacher would have beat me to death for how run on it was. Fixed it up a bit. Warhorus 04:20, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arckid

I added a couple of lines about Roy and Ant's new band, Arckid, as well as posing a link to Arckid's site. The new info was was removed (cited as linkspam). The minor reformatting I did was also removed (the need for the reformatting was arguable, and the removal does not cause me any grief). Could someone please explain to me why the Arckid info has been removed. If we aren't going to talk about the band's current activities, why not remove all references to Morningwood and the Twenty Twos? Are we just anti-Landon around here? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wekoontz (talk • contribs) .

Sorry, that was my spam-detection being overly sensitive. I didn't see the insertion of new material in with the reformatting, and spammers often make trivial changes higher up in articles so that people won't notice links being added. In combination with your red-linked username, I too-quickly judged it spam. I should have checked the link.

Still, I don't think the link belongs here. Notice that the Twenty Twos and Morningwood don't have links—the only external links are specifically Spacehog links. However, I've reinserted the info about Arckid. A better place for the link would be to turn Arckid into an (maybe short to start) article and have the link in the external links section there. Alternatively, the Antony Langdon and Royston Langdon articles could be turned into real articles instead of just redirects to Spacehog as they currently are, and an Arckid link would be highly appropriate there. What do you think?

(Aside from considerations of explicit links to the band site, I do think a reference-link is useful to back up the claim of what Arckid has accomplished so far, and I've put that in with the restored info.) — Saxifrage ✎ 16:41, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I say we keep at the bear minimum where the people in the band have moved on to. I think that people who liked these bands would be interested in knowing where the members split to so fans can follow the work. But beyond where they are, I don't think anything else in necessary. Oh, and I added a little note on Cragg joining Arckid. Comatoast 09:07, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree about splitting this into other articles—at this point almost half of this article is about stuff other than Spacehog. —johndburger 13:27, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Avril Troll spam

Don't know how it was done - but there is an annoying extra div overlapping the text of this page. Calydon (talk) 08:07, 10 July 2008 (UTC)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Calydon (talk • contribs) 07:32, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chart positions

I see that recently someone added a bunch of singles and chart positions to the page. Correct me if I'm wrong but I dont believe that "one of thes days" was a number one single in the US. Ive never even heard of it being released as a single.

Could someone with a bit more knowledge clean that mess up. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.5.119.142 (talk) 09:10, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They were added by 24.166.143.247. I've undone the edits as they appeared to be vandalism, and I've also undone edits by Roehl56, which is possibly the same user as they make similar edits to the same articles and both have previously received warnings for vandalism (although I'm not sure if the change to the US chart position of The Chinese Album was correct, as I couldn't find a source). snigbrook (talk) 17:13, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Spacehog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101231232555/http://shortformblog.com/music/joaquin-phoenix-spacehog-im-still-here/ to http://shortformblog.com/music/joaquin-phoenix-spacehog-im-still-here/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:11, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]