Jump to content

Variable Specific Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from VASIMR Engine)

Artist's impression of a multi-megawatt VASIMR spacecraft

The Variable Specific Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket (VASIMR) is an electrothermal thruster under development for possible use in spacecraft propulsion. It uses radio waves to ionize and heat an inert propellant, forming a plasma, then a magnetic field to confine and accelerate the expanding plasma, generating thrust. It is a plasma propulsion engine, one of several types of spacecraft electric propulsion systems.[1]

The VASIMR method for heating plasma was originally developed during nuclear fusion research. VASIMR is intended to bridge the gap between high thrust, low specific impulse chemical rockets and low thrust, high specific impulse electric propulsion, but has not yet demonstrated high thrust. The VASIMR concept originated in 1977 with former NASA astronaut Franklin Chang Díaz, who has been developing the technology ever since.[2]

Design and operation

[edit]
VASIMR schematic

VASIMR is a type of electrothermal plasma thruster/electrothermal magnetoplasma thruster. In these engines, a neutral, inert propellant is ionized and heated using radio waves. The resulting plasma is then accelerated with magnetic fields to generate thrust. Other related electrically powered spacecraft propulsion concepts are the electrodeless plasma thruster, the microwave arcjet rocket, and the pulsed inductive thruster.

The propellant, a neutral gas such as argon or xenon, is injected into a hollow cylinder surfaced with electromagnets. On entering the engine, the gas is first heated to a "cold plasma" by a helicon RF antenna/coupler that bombards the gas with electromagnetic energy, at a frequency of 10 to 50 MHz,[3] stripping electrons off the propellant atoms and producing a plasma of ions and free electrons. By varying the amount of RF heating energy and plasma, VASIMR is claimed to be capable of generating either low-thrust, high–specific impulse exhaust or relatively high-thrust, low–specific impulse exhaust.[4] The second phase of the engine is a strong solenoid-configuration electromagnet that channels the ionized plasma, acting as a convergent-divergent nozzle like the physical nozzle in conventional rocket engines.

A second coupler, known as the Ion Cyclotron Heating (ICH) section, emits electromagnetic waves in resonance with the orbits of ions and electrons as they travel through the engine. Resonance is achieved through a reduction of the magnetic field in this portion of the engine that slows the orbital motion of the plasma particles. This section further heats the plasma to greater than 1,000,000 K (1,000,000 °C; 1,800,000 °F)—about 173 times the temperature of the Sun's surface.[5]

The path of ions and electrons through the engine approximates lines parallel to the engine walls; however, the particles actually orbit those lines while traveling linearly through the engine. The final, diverging, section of the engine contains an expanding magnetic field that ejects the ions and electrons from the engine at velocities as great as 50,000 m/s (180,000 km/h).[4][6]

Advantages

[edit]

In contrast to the typical cyclotron resonance heating processes, VASIMR ions are immediately ejected from the magnetic nozzle before they achieve thermalized distribution. Based on novel theoretical work in 2004 by Alexey V. Arefiev and Boris N. Breizman of University of Texas at Austin, virtually all of the energy in the ion cyclotron wave is uniformly transferred to ionized plasma in a single-pass cyclotron absorption process. This allows for ions to leave the magnetic nozzle with a very narrow energy distribution, and for significantly simplified and compact magnet arrangement in the engine.[4]

VASIMR does not use electrodes; instead, it magnetically shields plasma from most hardware parts, thus eliminating electrode erosion, a major source of wear in ion engines.[7] Compared to traditional rocket engines with very complex plumbing, high performance valves, actuators and turbopumps, VASIMR has almost no moving parts (apart from minor ones, like gas valves), maximizing long term durability.[8]

Disadvantages

[edit]

According to Ad Astra as of 2015, the VX-200 engine requires 200 kW electrical power to produce 5 N of thrust, or 40 kW/N.[6] In contrast, the conventional NEXT ion thruster produces 0.327 N with only 7.7 kW, or 24 kW/N.[6] Electrically speaking, NEXT is almost twice as efficient, and successfully completed a 48,000 hours (5.5 years) test in December 2009.[9][10]

New problems also emerge with VASIMR, such as interaction with strong magnetic fields and thermal management. The inefficiency with which VASIMR operates generates substantial waste heat that needs to be channeled away without creating thermal overload and thermal stress. The superconducting electromagnets necessary to contain hot plasma generate tesla-range magnetic fields[11] that can cause problems with other onboard devices and produce unwanted torque by interaction with the magnetosphere. To counter this latter effect, two thruster units can be packaged with magnetic fields oriented in opposite directions, making a net zero-torque magnetic quadrupole.[12]

Research and development

[edit]

The first VASIMR experiment was conducted at Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1983. Important refinements were introduced in the 1990s, including the use of the helicon plasma source, which replaced the plasma gun originally envisioned and its electrodes, adding to durability and long life.[13]

As of 2010, Ad Astra Rocket Company (AARC) was responsible for VASIMR development, signing the first Space Act Agreement on 23 June 2005 to privatize VASIMR technology. Franklin Chang Díaz is Ad Astra's chairman and CEO, and the company had a testing facility in Liberia, Costa Rica on the campus of Earth University.[14]

VX-10 to VX-50

[edit]

In 1998, the first helicon plasma experiment was performed at the ASPL. VASIMR experiment 10 (VX-10) in 1998 achieved a helicon RF plasma discharge of up to 10 kW and VX-25 in 2002 of up to 25 kW. By 2005 progress at ASPL included full and efficient plasma production and acceleration of the plasma ions with the 50 kW, 0.5 newtons (0.1 lbf) thrust VX-50.[4] Published data on the 50 kW VX-50 showed the electrical efficiency to be 59% based on a 90% coupling efficiency and a 65% ion speed boosting efficiency.[15][failed verification]

VX-100

[edit]

The 100 kilowatt VASIMR experiment was successfully running by 2007 and demonstrated efficient plasma production with an ionization cost below 100 eV.[16] VX-100 plasma output tripled the prior record of the VX-50.[16]

The VX-100 was expected to have an ion speed boosting efficiency of 80%, but could not achieve this efficiency due to losses from the conversion of DC electric current to radio frequency power and the auxiliary equipment for the superconducting magnet.[15][17] In contrast, 2009 state-of-the-art, proven ion engine designs such as NASA's High Power Electric Propulsion (HiPEP) operated at 80% total thruster/PPU energy efficiency.[18]

VX-200

[edit]
VX-200 plasma engine at full power, employing both stages with full magnetic field

On 24 October 2008, the company announced in a press release that the helicon plasma generation component of the 200 kW VX-200 engine had reached operational status. The key enabling technology, solid-state DC-RF power-processing, reached 98% efficiency. The helicon discharge used 30 kW of radio waves to turn argon gas into plasma. The remaining 170 kW of power was allocated for acceleration of plasma in the second part of the engine, via ion cyclotron resonance heating.[19]

Based on data from VX-100 testing,[11] it was expected that, if room temperature superconductors are ever discovered, the VX-200 engine would have a system efficiency of 60–65% and a potential thrust level of 5 N. Optimal specific impulse appeared to be around 5,000 s using low cost argon propellant. One of the remaining untested issues was whether the hot plasma actually detached from the rocket. Another issue was waste heat management. About 60% of input energy became useful kinetic energy. Much of the remaining 40% is secondary ionizations from plasma crossing magnetic field lines and exhaust divergence. A significant portion of that 40% was waste heat (see energy conversion efficiency). Managing and rejecting that waste heat is critical.[20]

Between April and September 2009, 200 kW tests were performed on the VX-200 prototype with 2 tesla superconducting magnets that are powered separately and not accounted for in any "efficiency" calculations.[21] During November 2010, long duration, full power firing tests were performed, reaching steady state operation for 25 seconds and validating basic design characteristics.[22]

Results presented in January 2011 confirmed that the design point for optimal efficiency on the VX-200 is 50 km/s exhaust velocity, or an Isp of 5000 s. The 200 kW VX-200 had executed more than 10,000 engine firings with argon propellant at full power by 2013, demonstrating greater than 70% thruster efficiency relative to RF power input.[23]

VX-200SS

[edit]

In March 2015, Ad Astra announced a $10 million award from NASA to advance the technology readiness of the next version of the VASIMR engine, the VX-200SS to meet the needs of deep space missions.[24] The SS in the name stands for "steady state", as a goal of the long duration test is to demonstrate continuous operation at thermal steady state.[25]

In August 2016, Ad Astra announced completion of the milestones for the first year of its 3-year contract with NASA. This allowed for first high-power plasma firings of the engines, with a stated goal to reach 100 hr and 100 kW by mid-2018.[26] In August 2017, the company reported completing its Year 2 milestones for the VASIMR electric plasma rocket engine. NASA gave approval for Ad Astra to proceed with Year 3 after reviewing completion of a 10-hour cumulative test of the VX-200SS engine at 100 kW. It appears as though the planned 200 kW design is being run at 100 kW for reasons that are not mentioned in the press release.[27]

In August 2019, Ad Astra announced the successful completion of tests of a new generation radio-frequency (RF) Power Processing Unit (PPU) for the VASIMR engine, built by Aethera Technologies Ltd. of Canada.[28] Ad Astra declared a power of 120 kW and >97% electrical-to-RF power efficiency, and that, at 52 kg, the new RF PPU is about 10x lighter than the PPUs of competing electric thrusters (power-to-weight ratio: 2.31 kW/kg)

In July 2021, Ad Astra announced the completion of a record-breaking test for the engine, running it for 28 hours at a power level of 82.5 kW.[29] A second test, conducted from July 12 to 16, successfully ran the engine for 88 hours at a power level of 80 kW.[30] Ad Astra anticipates conducting 100 kW power level tests in 2023.[31]

Potential applications

[edit]

VASIMR has a comparatively poor thrust-to-weight ratio, and requires an ambient vacuum.

Proposed applications for VASIMR such as the rapid transportation of people to Mars would require a very high power, low mass energy source, ten times more efficient than a nuclear reactor (see nuclear electric rocket). In 2010 NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said that VASIMR technology could be the breakthrough technology that would reduce the travel time on a Mars mission from 2.5 years to 5 months.[32] However this claim has not been repeated in the last decade.

In August 2008, Tim Glover, Ad Astra director of development, publicly stated that the first expected application of VASIMR engine is "hauling things [non-human cargo] from low-Earth orbit to low-lunar orbit" supporting NASA's return to Moon efforts.[33]

Mars in 39 days

[edit]

In order to conduct an imagined crewed trip to Mars in 39 days,[34] the VASIMR would require an electrical power level far beyond anything currently possible.

On top of that, any power generation technology will produce waste heat. The necessary 200 megawatt reactor "with a power-to-mass density of 1,000 watts per kilogram" would require extremely efficient radiators to avoid the need for "football-field sized radiators".[35]

See also

[edit]
Electric propulsion
Space fission reactors

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Ad Astra Rocket Company. "VASIMR". Ad Astra Rocket Company. Archived from the original on July 7, 2019. Retrieved July 9, 2019.
  2. ^ Ad Astra Rocket Company. "History". Ad Astra Rocket Company. Retrieved July 9, 2019.
  3. ^ Alessandra Negrotti (2008). "VASIMR Prefeasibility Analysis". Advanced Propulsion Systems and Technologies, Today to 2020: 335.
  4. ^ a b c d Tim W. Glover; et al. (February 13–17, 2005). Principal VASIMR Results and Present Objectives (PDF). Space Technology and Applications International Forum - Staif 2005. Vol. 746. pp. 976–982. Bibcode:2005AIPC..746..976G. doi:10.1063/1.1867222. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 29, 2015. Retrieved February 27, 2010.
  5. ^ Beth Dickey (March 2004). "Star Power". Air & Space, Smithsonian. Retrieved February 7, 2014.
  6. ^ a b c Ad Astra Rocket Company (2009). "Technology". Ad Astra Rocket Company. Archived from the original on May 22, 2013. Retrieved December 10, 2012.
  7. ^ Jared P. Squire; Franklin R. Chang Díaz; Verlin T. Jacobson; Tim W. Glover; F. Wally Baity; Richard H. Goulding; Roger Bengtson; et al. "EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRESS TOWARD THE VASIMR ENGINE" (PDF). 28th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Toulouse, France, 17–21 March 2003. 28th International Electric Propulsion Conference. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 1, 2014. Retrieved February 7, 2014.
  8. ^ Kipp Larson (May 2016). VASIMR Engine (PDF) (Report). University of Colorado - Boulder. Retrieved April 2, 2023.
  9. ^ Dwayne Brown; Katherine K. Martin; Glenn Mahone. "NASA Thruster Achieves World-Record 5+ Years of Operation". Retrieved June 24, 2013.
  10. ^ Nancy Smith Kilkenny. "NEXT Provides Lasting Propulsion and High Speeds for Deep Space Missions". Retrieved September 29, 2013.
  11. ^ a b Jared P. Squire; et al. (September 5–6, 2008). "VASIMR Performance Measurements at Powers Exceeding 50 kW and Lunar Robotic Mission Applications" (PDF). International Interdisciplinary Symposium on Gaseous and Liquid Plasmas. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 26, 2015. Retrieved February 27, 2010.
  12. ^ "International Space Station Mission". Ad Astra Rocket Company. 2011. Archived from the original on March 15, 2011. Retrieved February 8, 2011. The VX-200 will provide the critical data set to build the VF-200-1, the first flight unit, to be tested in space aboard the International Space Station (ISS). The electrical energy will come from ISS at low power level, be stored in batteries and used to fire the engine at 200 kW.
  13. ^ "VASIMR (Variable Specific Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket)". eoportal.org. July 28, 2021. Retrieved April 2, 2023.
  14. ^ "Executive summary" (PDF). Ad Astra Rocket Company. January 24, 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 31, 2010. Retrieved February 27, 2010.
  15. ^ a b Squire, Jared P; et al. (September 17–20, 2007). "High Power VASIMR Experiments using Deuterium, Neon and Argon" (PDF). International Electric Propulsion Conference 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 26, 2015. Retrieved February 27, 2010.
  16. ^ a b "Ad Astra's VX-100 test bed achieves record plasma performance" (PDF). PRESS RELEASE 061207, June 12, 2007. Ad Astra. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 30, 2012. Retrieved February 7, 2014.
  17. ^ Bering, Edgar A; et al. (January 9–12, 2006). "Recent Improvements In Ionization Costs And Ion Cyclotron Heating Efficiency In The VASIMR Engine" (PDF). AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 19, 2016. Retrieved February 27, 2010.
  18. ^ Elliott, Frederick W; et al. (July 14, 2004). "An Overview of the High Power Electric Propulsion (HiPEP) Project". AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. doi:10.2514/6.2004-3453. ISBN 978-1-62410-037-6. Retrieved April 2, 2023.
  19. ^ "VASIMR VX-200 first stage achieves full power rating" (PDF) (Press release). Ad Astra Rocket Company. October 24, 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 5, 2015. Retrieved February 27, 2010.
  20. ^ de Faoite, Daithí; Browne, David J; Chang-Díaz, Franklin R; Stanton, Kenneth T (November 17, 2011). "A review of the processing, composition, and temperature-dependent mechanical and thermal properties of dielectric technical ceramics". Journal of Materials Science. 47 (10): 4211–4235. Bibcode:2012JMatS..47.4211F. doi:10.1007/s10853-011-6140-1. hdl:10197/8477. S2CID 137329155.
  21. ^ "VASIMR VX-200 reaches 200 kW power milestone" (PDF) (Press release). Ad Astra Rocket Company. September 30, 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 1, 2012. Retrieved February 24, 2012.
  22. ^ Benwl (December 15, 2010). "Video of VASIMR VX-200 firing for 25 seconds at full power rating". Ad Astra Rocket Company. Archived from the original on December 11, 2021. Retrieved January 4, 2011.
  23. ^ Ilin, Andrew V.; Gilman, Daniel A.; Carter, Mark D.; Chang Díaz, Franklin R.; Squire, Jared P.; Farrias, Joseph E. (2013). VASIMR Solar Powered Missions for NEA Retrieval and NEA Deflection (PDF). 33rd International Electric Propulsion Conference. October 6–10, 2013. Washington, D.C. IEPC-2013-336. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 14, 2014. Retrieved May 14, 2014.
  24. ^ "NASA Announces New Partnerships with U.S. Industry for Key Deep-Space Capabilities" (Press release). NASA. March 30, 2015. Retrieved July 24, 2021.
  25. ^ "Ad Astra Rocket Company wins major NASA advanced propulsion contract" (PDF) (Press release). Ad Astra Rocket Company. March 31, 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 24, 2021. Retrieved July 24, 2021.
  26. ^ "Ad Astra Rocket Company successfully completes all NASA NextStep Contract Milestones for year one, receives NASA approval to proceed with year two" (PDF) (Press release). Ad Astra Rocket Company. August 3, 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. Retrieved July 24, 2021.
  27. ^ "Ad Astra Rocket Company successfully completes all NASA NextStep Contract Milestones for year two, receives NASA approval to proceed with year three" (PDF) (Press release). Ad Astra Rocket Company. August 9, 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. Retrieved August 9, 2017.
  28. ^ "Aethera's New RF Power Processing Unit for the VASIMR Engine Successfully Completes Full Power Vacuum and Magnetic Field Tests at Ad Astra Rocket Company's Texas Facility" (PDF) (Press release). Ad Astra Rocket Company. August 20, 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. Retrieved July 24, 2021.
  29. ^ "Ad Astra Rocket Company shatters power and endurance record in recent tests of the VASIMR VX-200SS plasma rocket" (PDF) (Press release). Ad Astra Rocket Company. July 9, 2021. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  30. ^ "VASIMR VX-200SS plasma rocket completes record 88-hour high power endurance test" (PDF) (Press release). Ad Astra Rocket Company. July 22, 2021. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. Retrieved July 24, 2021.
  31. ^ "Franklin Chang Diaz discusses Hydrogen, VASIMR, Artemis, and Costa Rica Space Agency". February 10, 2023.
  32. ^ Morring, Frank (2010). "Commercial Route". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 172 (6): 20–23.
  33. ^ Irene Klotz (August 7, 2008). "Plasma Rocket May Be Tested at Space Station". Discovery News. Retrieved February 27, 2010.
  34. ^ Video: "Mars in 39 Days?: the VASIMR Plasma Engine. Franklin Chang-Diaz, Ph.D."
  35. ^ Video: VASIMR Debate/The VASIMR Hoax – Dr. Robert Zubrin – 14th International Mars Society Convention, Time Index 14:30

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to VASIMR.
NASA documents
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Variable_Specific_Impulse_Magnetoplasma_Rocket&oldid=1234439223"