Talk:Special Romanian Unicode characters

This article was nominated for deletion on May 27, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep.

Untitled

Oddly, on my system (Firebird 0.6.1, Linux, some mismash of fonts), the "wrong" and "right" versions for the s do differ, but for the t both show up as "t with comma below" -- neither is "t with cedilla." --Delirium 07:30, Aug 26, 2003 (UTC)

Never mind, I had misread the first time, and this is mentioned in the text. --Delirium 07:50, Aug 26, 2003 (UTC)

It's probably easiest if the general discussion on cedilla versus comma happened in one place, and I've started by arguing for it on Talk:Romanian Alphabet.

However, I also deleted a comment about 1860. It left me wondering why 1860; the date seemed very devoid of context. After looking around to Romanian language, I discovered that was the year of the first official standardization of Romanian. Which leaves me with two questions: were s/t with cedilla/comma even used before then, and which forms did they show? Perhaps backed up with explanations, it could be useful, but alone it's more confusing than explanitory. --Prosfilaes 06:26, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Suggest merging

I suggest to merge Special Romanian Unicode characters into Romanian alphabet because both articles discuss about the history of S-comma and T-comma, and that the character encoding problem is also mentioned in Romanian alphabet article. --Hello World! 16:01, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]