User talk:Cryptfiend64
Here are some links I find useful
- Wikipedia:Policy Library
- Wikipedia:Cite your sources
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:Wikiquette
- Wikipedia:Conflict resolution
- Wikipedia:Brilliant prose
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Wikipedia:Pages needing attention
- Wikipedia:Peer review
- Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
- Wikipedia:Village pump
- Wikipedia:Boilerplate text
Cheers, Sam Spade 00:55, 12 May 2004 (UTC)
[ ignore this comment - have replied at Talk:Tony_Blair ] Morwen 19:25, May 14, 2004 (UTC)
Hey Ugen-the-powerless. There was a hardware failure back in January which meant that about three days worth of uploads which hadn't yet been backed up were lost. At the time we were told that they might be rescued from the failed hard-drive in the future, but it doesn't look like anyone's going to do this. If you find broken images in articles then they need to be taken out or replaced I guess. fabiform | talk 00:43, 15 May 2004 (UTC)
- I got the images from google image searches, so I expect you can find the same one, or a similar one, to re-upload. fabiform | talk 14:40, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for starting Darfur conflict. -- Ke4roh 23:46, 26 May 2004 (UTC)
I've added the "{{prod}}" template to your user page (User:Cryptfiend64), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy).
Please note that the purpose of a user page is not as a personal homepage or used as a general webhosting service, but as a way for active editors of Wikipedia to introduce themselves to other editors. If you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues here or on my user talk page. You may remove the deletion notice, and the page will not be deleted for the moment, but note that it may still be sent to Miscellany for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Slgrandson (page - messages - contribs) 18:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Margaret Thatcher FAR
[edit]Margaret Thatcher has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)