User talk:Hirzel

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need any questions answered about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or drop me a line. BTW, we tend to shy away from one-line definitions here in to 'pedia. Thanx for mentioning BIOS in the firmware article -- that was a rather embarrassing omission for an online encyclopedia. Cheers! --maveric149

Hi! I left you a message there: http://fr.wikipedia.com/wiki.cgi?Curry/Discuter

Greetings,

I'm curious about your addition to Linguistics:

The term grammar usually covers phonology, morphology and syntax.

Instead of saying "usually", could we clarify what linguists or linguistic schools use this definition? I find this important because there also seem to be other notions of "grammar". Raimo Antilla (the historical linguist) defines grammar as "morphology and syntax", apparently without phonological involvement. Linguists with a more cognitive science bent seem to define grammar much more broadly, along the lines of "all the language-related information that's in your brain". Where does your definition come from?

--Ryguasu 23:00 Jan 22, 2003 (UTC)

Hey Hannes, great work on the edits to C sharp programming language and software engineering. They both look much better because of your changes. Thanks! —Frecklefoot 15:45 10 Jul 2003 (UTC)

File:WhiteEgyptianLotus.jpg

Hi, I'm working on the image tagging project and I was wondering if you know of any licence that applies to this image that you uploaded? --nixie 03:32, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Image tagging

Thousands of images have no copyright tags. You can help sort this out by clicking on this link!

Image:NymphaeaRubraRoxb.Asia.jpg

Greetings. I have listed Image:NymphaeaRubraRoxb.Asia.jpg on Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion because it has no source or licensing information, and it's not listed in any articles. If you would like this image to be kept, please add source and licensing information, and include it in an article. If you need any help with this, just ask me. Thanks! – Quadell ^{(talk) (sleuth)} 23:40, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)

ZurichFraumuenster.jpg listed for deletion

An image that you uploaded, ZurichFraumuenster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion because it lacks source and license information, and it is not used in any articles. Please go there to voice your opinion (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Typo3

Hi and thanks for the edits... it was basically what I had brought up for discussion but am unsure if you read it? Talk:Typo3#External_Links --Paul Laudanski 02:05, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Visual Basic Classic wikibook

I see you have contributed to articles on the BASIC programming language on Wikipedia. Any chance you would like to join in editing the wikibook: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:Visual_Basic_Classic? --Kjwhitefoot 11:02, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

De Foucauld

I was pleased to see that Charles de Foucauld already existed and, I might add, not really surprised upon finding your name in its history. I keep coming across your fine contributions; keep it up! You might like the images I just added. Regards, — mark ✎ 11:56, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:ZurichStPeter.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ZurichStPeter.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or {{fairuse}}. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Romeo Bravo 01:24, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! All you need to do is to remove {{No source notified}} and replace it with {{GFDL-self}}. --Romeo Bravo 14:30, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and tagged it {{GFDL-self}} for you --Romeo Bravo 21:35, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:NympheaColorataPeterAfrica.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:NympheaColorataPeterAfrica.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:59, 29 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November 1 18:59, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:NympheaColorataPeterAfrica.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:NympheaColorataPeterAfrica.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Papa November 1 18:59, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:CCommandLineArgv.png

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:CCommandLineArgv.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:53, 25 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 11:53, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:XSLTprocessing.PNG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:XSLTprocessing.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:52, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Gee, now I know another reason your name sounded familiar to me when we met in Santrokofi last month. Turns out we bumped into each other way back in 2005, when I congratulated you on your contributions to De Foucauld´s article (see above). It seems neither of us is very active on Wikipedia anymore. I'm just back home from my fieldtrip. Cheers, — mark ✎ 09:18, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

i love arabian coffie,,its makes me wake up until morning,, wewa 23:12, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of XLISP

The article XLISP has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims to notability, poorly sourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hama Dryad (talk) 18:16, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Semiology (Gregorian Chant)

The article Semiology (Gregorian Chant) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This 2008 unreferenced article has not been improved, has a "Bibliography" section, and too many "External links", so obviously using them improperly as "General references", so I added tags. This article lacks notability for a stand-alone article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Otr500 (talk) 21:23, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dynamic HTML

The article Dynamic HTML has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This term is obsolete; this term is not (and probably never was) notable; article has no sources and reads more like a guide

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anton.bersh (talk) 14:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dynamic HTML for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dynamic HTML is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamic HTML until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

4E616D65 (talk) 11:29, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"M. A." listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect M. A. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 4 § M. A. until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]