User talk:Maximusnukeage

You've uploaded an image of Plenty Uptopp which is under copyright. Unless you can demonstrate that you hold the copyright to that photo, or that it has been released into the public domain or under a license that is compatible with the GFDL, it will be deleted. Drop a note on the image's talk page if you have any objections. — Gwalla | Talk 06:21, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Hello there and welcome to Wikipedia! While we're generally an inclusive lot, we ask that any images you upload be demonstrably public domain, fair use, or otherwise legal for us to have. Images snagged from porn sites generally don't fall under those categories. Also, you may be interested to know that the site from which you linked the picture of Ms. Price attempts to load Malware on one's computer. Please consider running an Ad-Aware scan on your computer at once. Cheers, Mackensen 07:12, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

If you are unfamiliar with Wikipedia's rules and regulations regarding copyrighted materials, please take a look at the Contributing FAQ and the Copyrights guide. I must warn you that if you continue to upload content that you are not entitled to contribute under the GFDL, and continue to be uncommunicative, you may be blocked from editing.

I have locked this talk page to keep it from being blanked until this has been sorted out. Please reply at this subpage. Thank you. — Gwalla | Talk 02:13, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)

David Jonathan, You repeatedly ignored the requests to use only copyright-free images. (as seen in the history of this page) Unless you cease doing this, you will be banned from editing in wikipedia. Mikkalai 03:18, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I appologise. the rules concerning what is copyrighted and how to cite things are complicated. I appologise.

MaximusNukeage 05:14, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Please understand that there is BIG money in the pics of these lovely boobs. You live in the USA, aren't you? Lawyers can sue your sorry ass off you (or, what is much more probable, off wikipedia) once they get tipped. And the copyright rule to follow is very simple: if you don't know, then it is copyrighted. To be a bit more specific, all non-governmental is copyrighted unless explicitely stated. So, if you find a photo of a pretty hooker in FBI archives, bring it here :-) Mikkalai 06:36, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)

those rules are simple, I should be able to understand those MaximusNukeage 04:39, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)

By the way, a good source of 100% non-copyrighted images is Library of Congress (*The Library of Congress website). Each image there is supplied with its copyright status, description and reference number that may be placed into the wikipedia image page. I fetched quite few pics from there myself. Mikkalai 04:52, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)

If someone sends an email to the copyright holder and they grant permission, then you can use it?

Best of all, if they grant permission to use under GFDL license or for free use. Please read Wikipedia:Image use policy for more details. Mikkalai 15:59, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)

NYC meetup

Hi maxnuke, fellow texan ex-pat here... a meetup in NY is planned for the weekend of Nov 13: Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC. I hope you can make it :) +sj + 21:50, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)

no thanks MaximusNukeage 18:13, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Just in case, there is a meetup scheduled for Sunday, December 12 as well. (same link) – Ram-Man ^{(comment) (talk)}[[]] 23:29, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)

User Pic

Hi. I just found your user pic and, as part of the wikipedia image tagging project, I marked it as yours and noted that you release it into the public domain for copyright purposes. If this is inaccurate, please feel free to correct it. --InShaneee 18:09, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Isambard_Prince.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Isambard_Prince.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 21:33, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Stanley_H._Tweedle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stanley_H._Tweedle.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 21:54, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Suit1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Suit1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Fightindaman 00:30, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cowardly

If I am correct, it was you who redirected 'cowardly' to North Korea. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to cowardly. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. . --Ionius Mundus 02:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Appologies, that was just a gaff. MaximusNukeage 17:25, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Bunny(lexx).jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bunny(lexx).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for helping me with my RfA. -- :) Chetblong 20:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:KJI.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:KJI.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:52, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kim il sung.jpg

Please remove Image:Kim il sung.jpg from your User page. It is a fair use image, and as such, may not be used in a User page or in a template. Corvus cornix 23:11, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't have it on my page?? MaximusNukeage 14:17, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, sorry, fair use images can only be located on the articles that the fair use rationale was specified for. Corvus cornix 00:14, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see you still have the image on your User page. Please remove it. Corvus cornix 16:04, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My editor review.

Hey my RfA didn't go through, but I'm currently on editor review could you please comment there? Thanks in advance. :) Chetblong 01:23, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kai(lexx).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kai(lexx).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:08, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Reginald Priest.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Reginald Priest.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Isambard Prince.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Isambard Prince.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Junction, Colorado

You added the Weather section to Grand Junction, Colorado, can you cite a reference for your addition? Thanks, WikiDon (talk) 23:02, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Francine Dee

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Francine Dee, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

no genuine claim of notability (movie roles are minor generic characters) no reliable sources

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:37, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Waffen ss.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Waffen ss.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:43, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Stanley H. Tweedle.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Stanley H. Tweedle.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:43, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Krystal Steal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krystal Steal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krystal Steal (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 14:46, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Bunny(lexx).jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Bunny(lexx).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 22:51, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Case with New Parts.jpg

The file File:Case with New Parts.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, unclear use/purpose

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 01:32, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Inwood park.jpg

The file File:Inwood park.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image with no foreseeable encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:10, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:CampSite.jpg

The file File:CampSite.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, blurry, timestamp in corner makes it unlikely to be used, better free images of campsites exist.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm (talk) 23:30, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Henryhudsonbridge.jpg

The file File:Henryhudsonbridge.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low quality, superseded by files at c:Category:Henry Hudson Bridge.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:25, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]