Talk:Prithvi

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mythology Mid‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Religion Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Religion / Eastern / Ancient / Medieval Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Philosophy of religion
	Eastern philosophy
	Ancient philosophy
	Medieval philosophy

Untitled

I removed this:

Prithvi was also the Maharaja of Nepal at the Canton Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland, 13th March 1955

I don't understand it.

And this:

Prithvi Narayan Shah was the King of Gorkha who unified small states of around Gorkha to make the current Nepal.

His name is really Prithvinarayan. The 2 belong together. He is never referred to as 'king Prithvi'. (Prithvi is a female name). Prater 19:29, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Proposal to merge

I oppose the proposal to merge this article on the general concept of Prithvi with a specific regional goddess. The two are not equivalent, and since neither article is well-sourced, combining them will not improve them. Buddhipriya 21:20, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bhudevi or Bhumadevi is not a regional goddess. Bhu, Bhumi (like Dhra, Dhrati, Prithivi) are synonyms of Prithvi in Sanskrit, the suffix devi is added. Thus Prithvi and Bhudevi is the same goddess.--Redtigerxyz 10:48, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should this article be merged with Bhumadevi and redirected? Shruti14 (talk • contribs) 19:29, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i feel that Bhumadevi be merged into Prithvi, which is a wider concept - goddess and element and Bhumadevi be ridirected.--Redtigerxyz 13:26, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then, logically consistent, all goddesses should be merged into one article, they all are forms of the One. But Bhudevi is described totally different from Prithivi, because they are DIFFERENT forms of the earth goddess: Prithivi is spouse of the vedic (from the Vedas) god Dyaus Pita, but Bhudevi belongs to the puranic (from the Puranas) Varaha, avatar of Vishnu. So one article only would be totally wrong. (Sorry for my poor english, Durga from german wp) --80.108.164.202 21:10, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The names distinguish them, but Hinduism is syncretic. Modernly the names are interchangeably used for the same deity. The Varaha avatar story is a later syncretization of the earlier vedic Prthvi with Vaishnav avatar theory. Hence Vishnu absorbs all the qualities of the sky father in texts about Varaha that no longer acknowledge the (essentially defunct) vedic sky god. Originally Varaha was not an avatar of Vishnu either, but that is how he is acknowledged now. Iṣṭa Devatā (talk) 15:12, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 19:15, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

half-shells?

Is their some reason this concept should not be simplified to halves? μηδείς (talk) 03:29, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]