User talk:198.103.184.76/Archive 1

Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your host, proxy-w.ccra-adrc.gc.ca (198.103.184.76/Archive 1), is registered to Canada Revenue Agency and may be shared by multiple users of a government agency or facility, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

In the event of vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for your agency or facility's administration to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time and abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for further investigation.

Some government IP addresses are considered sensitive. If blocking this IP address, determine if Wikipedia:SIP applies; if so, follow directions.

Officials and network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

March 2012

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Fitzcarraldo. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Rostz (talk) 23:18, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Drosopigi, Florina with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:34, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

iihf

please read up on the rules for the world championships and olympic classification before editing, you are making a mess!!!!!18abruce (talk) 19:40, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

IIHF WC 2012

I think, Switzerland final ranking is eleventh place. They have better score than Latvia but were at 6th place in their group, while Latvia 5th. 1)Position 2)Points 3)Score 4)Goals scored 5)IIHF ranking. f. e. look at 2008 IIHF WC, where CZE was 5th, while USA 6th (with better score, but worse position. After both teams were defeated in quarterfinals). And look at rules for Vancouver 2010 preliminary table too. --CZMajkl (talk) 19:42, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:56, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 18:42, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Milos Raonic. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 17:22, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Hello, I'm Mephistophelian. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Canada Border Services Agency, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Mephistophelian (talk) 16:29, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/China Eagle Union.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rushbugled13 (talk) 02:52, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ANSI X3.5 - ISO 102b.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rushbugled13 (talk) 02:54, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copywright violations in Randhawa

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:41, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm Signalizing. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Gig Morton, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Signalizing (talk) 20:15, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ANSI X3.5 - ISO 102b concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ANSI X3.5 - ISO 102b, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:38, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ANSI X3.5 - ISO 102b

Hello 198.103.184.76. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "ANSI X3.5 - ISO 102b".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ANSI X3.5 - ISO 102b}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 17:01, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mobeen (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mobeen.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
- Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rankersbo (talk) 09:20, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 198.103.184.76, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

February 2014

Hello, I'm DavidLeighEllis. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bert and Ernie because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:39, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at PSR B1919+21. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. StringTheory11 (t • c) 02:17, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Reference Errors on 7 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Kel-Tec SU-16 page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Timeline of Rob Ford video scandal. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Citobun (talk) 16:37, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:23, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Salvatore Maranzano. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Newt1986 (talk) 16:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2015

Hello, I'm Diannaa. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Puńsk without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:18, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2016

Hello, I'm Eduardofeld. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jollof rice— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. E. Feld ^talk 18:48, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Roman Polák, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:53, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to St. Catharines Saints. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Echoedmyron (talk) 01:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to CFBC— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:59, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 9 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Best practice page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kekeke listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kekeke. Since you had some involvement with the Kekeke redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Gorthian (talk) 02:09, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm Champion. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Technical support. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 22:00, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Babymissfortune. An edit you recently made to Presentation National High School seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ^{Babymissfortune} 14:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Rachel Dolezal. - Mlpearc (open channel) 15:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Energy Star into United States Environmental Protection Agency. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:41, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to 2013 Tim Hortons Brier

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from 2013 Tim Hortons Brier without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! RoCo^(talk) 13:47, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Top Chef Canada (season 3)

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Cheers!
Gareth Griffith-Jones, The Welsh Buzzard (Talk) 16:17, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing Race Edits

Why are you removing the italicized placings in the results for each of the amazing race seasons. The notes specify that the italic placing is for the half way point, why are you editing each page to remove the italicizing while leaving the note there. Please leave edit summaries when making edits in the future, especially ones that people will have questions about. WikiVirusC (talk) 19:52, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lambton College. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LynxTufts (talk) 13:35, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Laurence, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 05:25, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dunlap, Tennessee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:41, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Coalition Avenir Québec, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jiten^talk_contribs 22:02, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of Keeping Up with the Kardashians episodes, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 08:49, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

False edits

Hi I noticed you keep editing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/19_Kids_and_Counting#Grandchildren and The dates you put for the due dates for the babies are not true. So please can you stop doing this or I will have to report you. For making false edits

HospitalHistory (talk) 20:12, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Could you please stop adding the due dates for Jinger, Joseph and Joy-Anna since they are rumoured and not true.

HospitalHistory (talk) 13:49, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2005 New England Patriots season. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tarl N. (discuss) 22:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Coalition Avenir Québec, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. IagoQnsi (talk) 20:53, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2018

Hello, I'm Armadillopteryx. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Hi, I see you've made a number of unsourced changes to the progress tables in articles related to RuPaul's Drag Race. Please don't introduce changes like that unless you have a reliable source. Feel free to reply to this comment if you have any questions :-) Armadillopteryx^talk 20:43, 7 May 2018 (UTC) Armadillopteryx^talk 20:43, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at RuPaul's Drag Race (season 6), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Armadillopteryx^talk 20:59, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mauritius, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 08:00, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at St. Louis Blues. Strikerforce^Talk 19:22, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2018

Hello, I'm Wham2001. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Hue Jackson seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wham2001 (talk) 15:28, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Divya Dutta, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 21:29, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Java EE version history. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:04, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2019

Hello. Mind explaining how the information you removed from the Masai Ujiri article is irrelevant? It looks relevant enough to me. It doesn't seem to be as "tiny" as you make it seem. TitanSymphony (talk) 17:34, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to List of multilingual countries and regions. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Puzzledvegetable^{Is it teatime already?} 19:01, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Exposure Notification are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 20:15, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:European Network of Forensic Science Institutes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:European Network of Forensic Science Institutes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 21:29, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Regions of Morocco, you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 21:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Eastern Commerce Collegiate Institute, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jusdafax (talk) 17:28, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Representational state transfer, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Exclusive Editor _{Notify Me!} 15:38, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.