Jump to content

Talk:Chemical property

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

i think this article has too much detail and may be difficult to understand for younger students... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.13.115.52 (talk) 01:19, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article sucks. In fact I really don't think it should be an article. How about a List of chemical properties instead? ike9898 14:32, Mar 2, 2004 (UTC)

I've always learned that the phase of a substance is a physical property. What gives?


The phase of a substance IS a physical property. This article is incorrect. Water has the same chemical composition regardless of its phase. H20 is H20 as ice, as liquid, and as a gas - thus, a physical change. The difference between these phases is the speed of the molecules, not a chemical difference. In solids, they move very slowly. In liquids, they move faster. In gases, they move faster still.

what?

[edit]

This article includes the phrase "fatness." I don't think that's exactly a word.

WHY DOESNT IT TELL YOU THE DEFINITION?!i need it for science GOSH someone please put the definition on it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.145.199.32 (talk) 00:33, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wiktionary:fatness, "The state of being fat." Nigholith 00:35, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I remember when I edited this page

[edit]

I was a a wikipedia nooby and I didn't know how to properly sign reverts... LOL, okay this is Reeves by the way...oh yeah, i almost forgot.I'm a loser. Reeves 03:18, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ώΨÁtever....♠

comments

[edit]

I believe that this article has too much detail. It may be a little difficult for younger kids to follow. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.13.115.52 (talk) 01:20, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would prefer a list, not two confusing paragraphs — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.82.104.57 (talk) 03:40, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to ...

[edit]

What about the idea of redirecting this strange article to chemistry or to chemical?--Smokefoot (talk) 17:46, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]