Talk:Lord of Illusions

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Untitled

This film is quite complex, especially considering the D'Amour character and the merging of the Noir and contemporary Horror styles. I plan to add alot to this entry in the near future.

Barker used multiple sources for this movie. He may have based it on "The Last Illusion", but the scene where all the cult members sink into the mud is from "Skins of the Fathers", an earlier story that he wrote. The 'Swann' character was the most annoying whiner in the history of film.

Noir and horror...so Barker did something completely unique if we disregard Angel Heart and Cast a Deadly Spell, etc.?71.189.237.68 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 15:21, 15 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Actually, I think móst works by writer HP Lovecraft can be considered a fusion between Noir and Horror, but that's probably where the word "resurrect" from the article comes in. It's not a new thing, but Barker tried to bring it back. Cyanid (talk) 17:21, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Popular"??

I'm sorry, but shouldn't popular culture include culture that is popular? And, in the absence of culture that is popular, should the section labeled "Popular Culture" be subtracted? In the least, should it be titled "Allusory Inspiration" if we are being nice, or "Nobodies piggybacking on the works of somebody" if we are being honest?

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lord of Illusions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120319032439/http://www.mindphaser.com/index.php?page_id=150 to http://www.mindphaser.com/index.php?page_id=150

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:05, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]