Talk:Gigakelvin

from VfD:

No potential to become encyclopedic. 203.61.88.62 04:50, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Agreed. Delete. --Kelly Martin 05:11, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)
Delete -- I assume we have an article about Kelvin (Wikipedia is so damned slow I don't want to take the time to look right now.) DCEdwards1966 06:27, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)
You can put prefixes before every unit. Doesn't make it material for a seperate article. Delete. Mgm|^(talk) 11:08, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)
GigaDelete RoySmith 22:12, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete, else terrakelvins will be next. Wyss 04:31, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Redirect to kelvin or 1 E9 K. Eric119 06:25, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Redirect to either of the above. (wow, there's a 1 E9 K article. I'm impressed.) --Death phoenix 20:16, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I'm not; 1 E9 K should be deleted too --RoySmith 20:35, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Redirect, to Kelvin. Megan1967 02:33, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
That's really frikken hot. Delete it and its buddy, 1 E9 K. Is this even a real term that needs a redirect? hfool/Roast me 02:11, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not enough for article. Pavel Vozenilek 22:20, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

end moved discussion

Start a discussion about improving the Gigakelvin page

Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Gigakelvin" page.

Start a discussion