Talk:Roman candle (firework)

Diagram request

Diagram of construction

Added a diagram --Petteri Aimonen (talk) 21:20, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto on the origin

Why are they named Roman Candles?

My grade 11 history teacher told us that I believe it was Nero back in Rome who prosecuted Christans, and he was so crazy that he liked to burn Christians alive, hence the name.

Why plural?

Shouldn't this article redirect to Roman candle and be re-written to be singular? That is wiki-convention, is it not? —Frecklefoot 16:50, 8 Jan 2004 (UTC)

What's the origin of the name? Does it refer to Roman Catholics being burned at the stake? Deb 19:50, 8 Jan 2004 (UTC)

One can infer that the housing represents a Christian circa 64 A.D. and that the ignited charge symbolizes that Christian's soul's ascent into heaven. But this is inference. Further research is necessary. PCB —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.162.156 (talk) 01:43, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Second picture

Personally, I believe the second picture should be removed. First, it does not show any benefit more than the first picture. Also, the person in the picture is using unsafe practices, including holding a firework in his hand that is almost always labeled "Do Not Hold In Hand," as well as wearing unsafe clothing for using fireworks. 71.0.221.41 (talk) 19:24, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. I think the first picture should be removed; It's not actually depicts a roman candle. 124.168.135.216 (talk) 09:58, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Roman candle (firework). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130514010617/http://www.pyrouniverse.com:80/statelaws.htm to http://www.pyrouniverse.com/statelaws.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:44, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Construction image wrong or multiple types exist

having just dismantled a roman candle myself a day ago, the construction of mine was very different to what's pictured. The stars are balls, not flat discs. There is only 1 cardboard stopper in the tube at the beginning, to keep the contents inside. There is no cardboard between the stars. Between each star is an amount of smokeless powder, and an equal amount of a gold coloured material for making the shower of sparks between stars firing, and repeat. Presumably the smokeless powder confined inside of the cardboard tube is the mechanism for launch the stars with the particular brand. I'm sorry that I'm unable to recall the brand.

I'm not mecessarily saying the diagram in the construction section is incorrect. Just that the section seems incomplete in that it lacks any other designs. I understand it's not practical to include descriptions of every conceivable design. But, I think at least a couple of other types. 2607:FEA8:99E0:61D0:7882:67FA:4A4F:65F6 (talk) 03:41, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]