Talk:Fijación Oral, Vol. 1

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fijación Oral, Vol. 1 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Fijación Oral, Vol. 1 is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 31, 2014.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 15, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed
August 24, 2013	Peer review	Reviewed
October 7, 2013	Featured article candidate	Promoted
June 16, 2024	Good topic candidate	Not promoted
Current status: Featured article

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Colombia Low‑importance

	Colombia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Colombia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Colombia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ColombiaWikipedia:WikiProject ColombiaTemplate:WikiProject ColombiaColombia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on August 23, 2013.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Latin music High‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shakira High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakira, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Shakira on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShakiraWikipedia:WikiProject ShakiraTemplate:WikiProject ShakiraShakira articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Improvement Ideas

I would like too see one Shakira article get a Good Article tag. Fijacion Oral would be a good place to start. We can start by improving the critical reviews section, making a separate commercial reception section, a promotion section that talks about the singles and their chart performance along with a brief paragraph or two about the Oral Fixation Tour. Also, we need to find more information regarding the recording, collaborations, compositions of the songs, etc. to help improve the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.109.147.18 (talk) 06:52, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

I thought the album's name is Fijacion Oral Vol. 1??

singles

Neither Obtener Un Si or Las De la Intuition have charted on the billboard hot latin tracks. Nor have No and Dia De Enero on the Billboard hot 100

http://billboard.com/bbcom/retrieve_chart_history.do?model.vnuArtistId=147604&model.vnuAlbumId=683532 http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&searchlink=SHAKIRA&sql=11:mflvadokt8wj~T51

24.23.228.148 02:10, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to Billboard the following songs charted on the following charts:

Dia Especial - Latin Pop Songs (#26)^[1] Las de la Intuicion - Latin Pop Songs (#16) and Latin Songs (#32) ^[2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.109.147.18 (talk) 06:19, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ [1]
^ [2]

Notes

From Billboard: [3] Erick (talk) 19:39, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Fijación Oral, Vol. 1/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Maine12329 (talk · contribs) 09:04, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

A few issues with the references but article is overall well written

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Replacable primary sources.
Should metrolyrics really be the reference 15 in the 3rd and 4th paragraphs?
reference 15 could be improved. (billboard.biz is defunct) reference 21 does not state the director's name.

Ref 15 leads to a archived version of the site which is perfectly acceptable if no substitute can be found. See WP:LINKROT. Erick (talk) 19:44, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I think that section 2's references can be easily improved. No major issues with the article

I corrected the Metrolyrics references and added one for the director. However, the Billboard.biz (archived) reference opened up fine for me. WikiRedactor (talk) 19:52, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

regarding that archived reference, I've left a comment on Wikipedia talk:Using the Wayback Machine because I just find it strange that a subscription-only chart is archived and may result in copyright violations. It's not a problem with this Shakira article then. I had thought that perhaps the usual citing of Billboard [4] would suffice but apparently their chart archives for Latin Songs Year-End don't date back to 2005. ⊾maine12329⊿ talks ✿wiki 01:14, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Before the website relaunched earlier this year, it had posted Year-end charts up till 2002. The others could be found by searching Billboard magazines on Google Books. Now, only Google Books can be used for earlier years and some of the issues are missing which contain year-end charts. Erick (talk) 05:07, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't want to interrupt but it seems the article has passed. If so, then one should certainly change the talk page and do all that icon and listing stuff. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 17:03, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Quick comments

These are just brief comments so I didn't include them in the PR:

Images need alt text including the album cover
The four million sales needs an "as of" date. Erick (talk) 17:11, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fijación Oral, Vol. 1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140709100356/http://www.hitparade.ch/year.asp?key=2005 to http://hitparade.ch/year.asp?key=2005

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fijación Oral, Vol. 1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fijación Oral, Vol. 1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/album/7369453/review/7471710
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029202345/http://www.estereofonica.com/premios-nuestra-tierra-a-lo-mejor-de-la-musica-colombiana/ to http://www.estereofonica.com/premios-nuestra-tierra-a-lo-mejor-de-la-musica-colombiana/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:06, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fijación Oral, Vol. 1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141231193653/http://www.eluniversal.com/2005/06/07/til_art_07316E to http://www.eluniversal.com/2005/06/07/til_art_07316E

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] [1]

[2] [2]

[1]

[2]