Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PurePanties.com
Advertisement. Joyous 01:31, Jun 29, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete SkArcher 01:44, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. I do not believe this is an advertisement, because I don't believe the original user who wrote it is affiliated with them. However, it's not a well-known website, so not encyclopedic. Derrick Coetzee 02:14, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. We don't need an article for every porn site on the web. --Tothebarricades.tk 02:35, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Delete - Delete - Delete - and again I say Delete Kevin Rector 02:40, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Yup. Krupo 02:45, Jun 29, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. It's an ad. - Aaron Hill 07:56, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Keep - For all of you who think its an ad, I have been writing for two years here, I dont go for that. I only write about what I like, to keep this site fun for me to come back. Read the Profanity word bit, does that sound like an ad to you??? Ive seen less encyclopedic articles here, like Sarah Marple-Cantrell (and I think that one is worth of being here). - Antonio Kiss my ... Martin
- Just because the firm itself didn't write it doesn't mean it's not an ad. DJ Clayworth 17:22, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence it's a particularly notable site. Wikipedia is not a web directory. Andrewa 13:10, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Article does not present any notability. --Zigger 14:12, 2004 Jun 29 (UTC)
- Delete. Not really an ad, but this is a non-notable soft-porn website. As stated, this isn't a web directory nor should it become one. Big guns like eBay, Drudge Report, MoveOn, Google, MSN, Yahoo! and the like are notable, to name a very few. Dis don't ring da bell. - Lucky 6.9 16:53, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Alexa ranking well below 100,000 + non-notable = delete. -Sean Curtin 17:11, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Ad for porn. Delete. DJ Clayworth 17:21, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Oh my... Delete. Fire Star 20:30, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
DELETE!